SaaS Pricing Models & When to Use Outcome-Based Pricing

TL;DR
This article provides a strategic analysis of various SaaS pricing models, guiding businesses toward effective SaaS monetization strategies. It details common approaches like tiered, per-user, and usage-based pricing, outlining their respective pros and cons. The piece then focuses on outcome-based pricing, explaining how it aligns cost directly with the measurable results achieved by the customer, fostering strong partnerships, especially in the enterprise sector. While acknowledging the complexity of tracking outcomes, the guide presents this model as a powerful differentiator for B2B SaaS subscription design when value can be clearly quantified, ultimately driving higher customer lifetime value.

SaaS pricing models are how subscription-based businesses grow and stay profitable. Choosing the right one isn’t just about setting a number; it’s about understanding your customers, their value perception, and how your product fits into their daily workflow. Whether tiered pricing, usage-based plans, or a freemium model, the right strategy can fuel adoption, reduce churn, and maximize lifetime value. In today’s competitive SaaS landscape, your pricing model is more than a billing method; it’s a growth engine.

Understanding SaaS Pricing Models: The Core Options

Choosing the proper structure requires understanding the fundamental approaches to SaaS monetization strategies.

1. Tiered Pricing

• Concept: Offering several packages (e.g., Basic, Pro, Enterprise) with increasing levels of features, usage limits (e.g., storage, number of projects), or support.
• Pros: Easy for customers to understand, allows for upselling, caters to different market segments.
• Cons: Can be difficult to define tiers perfectly, users may feel limited by arbitrary restrictions.

2. Per-User Pricing (Per Seat)

• Concept: Charging a flat rate for each individual user accessing the software. Often combined with tiered feature sets.
• Pros: Simple to calculate, predictable revenue, scales directly with customer team size.
• Cons: Can become a barrier to adoption within larger teams (discourages adding users), doesn’t always align with the value received (one power user vs. many light users).

3. Usage-Based Pricing (Pay-As-You-Go)

• Concept: Charging based on consumption of a specific metric (e.g., API calls made, gigabytes stored, emails sent, transactions processed).
• Pros: Aligns cost directly with usage (value for many), highly scalable, low barrier to entry for small users.
• Cons: Revenue can be less predictable, can be complex for customers to forecast costs, requires robust metering infrastructure. Usage-based pricing enterprise models need careful design.

The Rise of Outcome-Based (Value-Based) Pricing

While the above models focus on features or usage, outcome-based pricing takes a different approach.

• Concept: Price is based directly on the measurable business outcome or value the customer achieves using the software. Examples: charging a percentage of revenue generated, cost savings realized, or leads converted using the platform.

• Pros:
  • Perfect Value Alignment: Customers only pay more if they achieve more value, creating a strong partnership.
  • Powerful Differentiator: Signals strong confidence in your product’s ability to deliver results.
  • Potential for Higher Revenue: Captures a share of the significant value created for high-performing customers.
• Cons:
  • Complexity: Requires a clear, mutually agreed-upon way to measure the outcome accurately and reliably.
  • Risk Sharing: Your revenue is tied to your customer’s success, which external factors can influence.
  • Difficult Sales Cycle: A more consultative sales process is required to establish the value metric and tracking.

Outcome-based pricing is challenging but potentially transformative, especially for B2B SaaS subscription design targeting enterprises where value can be clearly quantified. Implementing such models often requires sophisticated CRM subscription platform design.

Choosing the Right Model: Key Considerations

There’s no single “best” model. The optimal choice depends on:

• Your Product: How is value delivered? Is it feature-based, usage-based, or outcome-based?
• Your Target Market: Are you selling to SMBs (often prefer simplicity) or enterprises (may value flexibility or outcome alignment)?
• Your Value Metric: Can you easily and reliably measure the core value your product provides?
• Your Competitors: How are similar products priced in the market?

Often, a hybrid approach works best, combining elements of different models (e.g., tiered plans with usage-based overages). A strategic process of go-to-market product planning includes rigorous pricing analysis.

Pricing Strategy in Action: Case Studies

Case Study 1: A Marketing Automation Platform (Tiered + Usage)

• The Challenge: A marketing automation startup needed a model that catered to both small businesses with basic needs and larger teams sending millions of emails.
• Our Solution: We helped them design a hybrid model. They offered three core tiers based on feature access (e.g., basic automation vs. advanced AI features). Within each tier, there was a usage-based component based on the number of contacts in their database and emails sent per month.
• The Result: This model provided a low barrier to entry for small businesses while allowing the platform to scale revenue effectively as clients grew their lists and usage, proving a successful SaaS monetization strategy.

Case Study 2: An eCommerce Optimization Tool (Outcome-Based)

• The Challenge: A company developed an AI tool that significantly increased conversion rates for online stores but struggled to convince clients of its value with a traditional subscription fee.
• Our Solution: They pivoted to an outcome-based model, charging clients a small percentage of the additional revenue generated through the conversion lift attributed to their tool. This required building robust tracking and reporting into their platform, often involving complex development similar to building eCommerce SaaS billing systems.
• The Result: The risk-free proposition was highly attractive to clients. The company’s revenue became directly tied to the value they delivered, leading to strong client relationships and rapid growth driven by demonstrable results.

Our Technology Stack for SaaS Billing & Metering

Implementing flexible pricing requires a robust backend.

• Billing Platforms: Stripe Billing, Chargebee, Zuora, Recurly
• Usage Metering: Custom logging, potentially using time-series databases (InfluxDB) or streaming platforms (Kafka)
• Backend: Node.js, Python, Go, .NET
• Cloud: AWS, Azure, GCP (for scalable infrastructure)
• Analytics: Tableau, Power BI (for analyzing pricing effectiveness)

Conclusion

Selecting and refining your SaaS pricing models is an ongoing strategic process, not a one-time decision. From tiered and per-user options to sophisticated usage-based pricing enterprise plans and value-driven outcome models, the right structure aligns your revenue with the value you deliver. Continuously analyzing data, gathering customer feedback, and being willing to experiment are key to optimizing your SaaS monetization strategies for long-term success.

Ready to design a pricing strategy that accelerates your growth? At Wildnet Edge, our AI-first approach enhances our SaaS monetization consulting services. We build intelligent platforms with flexible billing and metering capabilities, helping you capture the true value you create for your customers.

FAQs